More Hindemith Trios This may well be the first time on this blog that I have offered the same work in consecutive posts, or even featured the same composer. But Nick's recent postingsat Grumpy's Classics Cave, of Mozart and Beethoven string trios played by the Pougnet-Riddle-Pini trio reminded me that I had their valuable coupling of the two Hindemith trios in its third Westminster incarnation, as part of their "Collectors' Series", a mids reissue series derived from monaural chamber music recordings of a decade earlier and, thankfully, not "updated" with fake stereo trickery: Two String Trios No.
Love of History What was more important, the Classical or the Hellenistic era? Constantina Katsari, a professional economic historian and numismatist, writes about her passions: What was more important, the Classical or the Hellenistic era? Without a doubt, the Hellenistic times were the beginning of a new status quo.
However it was closely connected to its preceded time period. The Classical period is known as the best time of the Ancient Greek antiquity, the most impressive era; being so significant itself that it cast a serious influence to all western civilization.
More particularly, Athens became the intellectual centre of the ancient world -literature, philosophy, sciences, arts, architecture- all were at their prime. Athens and Sparta came into collision as a result of their developing power and need of imposition to each other.
It did not present the impressive characteristics the Classical period presented; however that does not make Hellenistic times less significant.
It was a period of abrupt changes that altered everything that preceded it to its foundations.
Yet, these changes did not cut off the Hellenistic Period from the Classical Period or vice versa. The changes that took place were seen to be the evolutionary step between the two historical periods and contributed to the continuity of Classical Times through the Hellenistic Times.
Elements like religion, philosophy or literature changed their perspectives during Hellenistic years but used the starting material of Classical Times. For example, according to Bugh Their physical and social entity continued to exist throughout the Hellenistic period. In older poleis, the element of continuity between Classical and Hellenistic times is strong Bugh, Therefore, the progress of the era when it comes to what I have previously referred to should not be taken as decay or as the end of the classical period.
The innovations that appeared during the Hellenistic period do not paint the picture of degeneration; contrariwise they paint the picture of evolution by using all the meritorious material from the Classical period and transforming it into what today is known as Hellenistic.
The two historical periods were at a constant interaction, with Hellenistic period evolving the Classical elements. The Hellenistic period being different and totally unlike to its preceded historical period should not constitute a decadence but a continuation. What I am trying to prove is the continuity of the historical periods and especially that of Hellenistic Times succeeding the Classical Times.
The Hellenistic era is fascinating to itself with arts, exploration, literature, theatre, architecture, music, mathematics, philosophy and science being spread deep into the Near East.
The Greek civilization reached places that Greeks were never heard of. Every part of the Classical Period that constituted civilization, during the Hellenistic Period continued to evolve.
It would be wrong and unrealistic for the historical period that Alexander the Great inaugurated to be regarded as less historically important.
Each historical period reflects the way its people were handling and confronting every aspect of their life. During Hellenistic Times people took the magnificent outburst of Classical Times and evolved into what today composes the Hellenistic civilization.
It would be prejudiced and one-sided if we were just following the idea that the Classical Times were the prime and the Hellenistic times were the decay of it.
They are two distinguished periods, each of which has something else to contribute, however they are not unconnected. On the contrary they are close related by means that the Hellenistic Times continue the evolution of the Classical times, expressed through a different point of view. By Alexia Michalaki Bugh R.
The Cambridge Companion to the Hellenistic World. A history of the ancient world.History of Greece: Classical Greece. The flurry of development and expansion of the Archaic Era was followed by the period of maturity we came to know as “Classical Greece”.
Between and until BCE Athens and Sparta dominated the Hellenic world with their cultural and military achievements. For some scholars, the Hellenistic period is considered as a period of decadence or degeneration when compared to the brilliance of the Greek Classical Era.
The Classical Period in World History In general, the classical period of world history spanned the millennium from bce to ce. During this time, a series of powerful empires developed (Rome, Persia, India, China, etc.) that were much larger in scale and scope than any of the kingdoms of the early river valley societies, including Egypt.
The 18th Century proudly referred to itself as the "Age of Enlightenment" and rightfully so, for Europe had dwelled in the dim glow of the Middle Ages when suddenly the lights began to come on in men's minds and humankind moved forward.
The Classical Era in World History: The Big Picture B.C.E. – C. Robert W. Strayer Studying world history has much in common with using. The classical period in ap world history 1. The Classical Period in World History Thursday, May 9, 13 2.
Periodiza5on: ClassicalThursday, May 9, 13 End of the Classical Era albano. 32 bentley3 Hugh_ 02 bentley3 Hugh_ CLASSICAL PERIOD MUSIC Cey Gloria. Introduction of Arts Sam Aclan.