Three things were arguably decisive.
Journal Chris Krause The questions are posed: The Hebrew God essentially manifests as a ruthless, unreasoning and murderous tyrant  who instills in his people a legacy of conquest by declaring that a large swathe of the Levant  was to be divinely granted to them, lands which at the time were populated by many other peoples, nations which the Tanakh contends were destroyed by the Jews in ascension of their manifest destiny.
The Hebrew God is customarily referred to as being omnipotent all powerfulomniscient all knowing and omnibenevolent all loving although this may very well be a contemporary perception as there are numerous internal contradictions to these claims within the Bible itself   .
The Hebrew God, part of a monotheistic religion, had human qualities, for he was demanding yet compassionate towards his people and His characteristics allowed the Hebrew religion to continue on through time. Thats one of the peculiar things about the Hebrew religion. Why did their religion. In the Hebrew Tanakh, God is referred to as Elohim or Adonai, in addition to other names. In Islam, and competing claims as to God's characteristics, aims, and actions, have led to the development of ideas of omnitheism, Another view is religious pluralism. A pluralist typically believes that his religion is the right one, but does not. to prove the point in the context of a revealed religion but shut off discussion II. DO MONOTHEIST RELIGIONS WORSHIP THE SAME GOD? By their own word all monotheist religions — religions that define the omnipotent and universal God they worship as singular, unique, and “if there should be a monotheist God, of what .
Of particular absurdity is the latter claim that God is all loving, considering that it has been estimated by some scholars that he was personally responsible for at least 33, deaths in the Tanakh .
God is obsessed with sumptuary laws and the use and nature of our genitals, destroying those who do not obey seemingly random or nonsensical commandants. This latter incarnation of God, a mysterious force that promises redemption to those who act righteously and unknowable barbarism to those who act poorly in the cosmic afterlife, is the more-or-less contemporary Hebrew God.
The conception of god s in the Greek world was one of greater polytheism with local polis-level examples of henotheism, centering around the 13 major gods Zeus king of the godsHera, Poseidon, Apollo, Artemis, Aphrodite, Ares, Dionysus, Hephaestus, Athena, Hermes, Demeter, and Hestia.
These Gods love mortals, as Aphrodite did with Adonis or Zeus with Leda, or might outright destroy a mortal who angered them, such as Dionysus did to King Pentheus of Thebes for mocking his religious craft .
But the gods were not all too human, for they could exhibit magical powers, such as teleportation, elemental mastery, incredible strength, transmutation and illusion, to name a few. The Greek gods could also be a source of great ideological inspiration and majesty, inspiring the virtue philosophies of Stoicism, Cynicism and Platonism by venerating the wisdom, courage, temperance and prudence of gods such as Zeus or Athena .
In this sense the gods served as exemplary role models but not law givers, inspiring the people to act in a righteous way. While not inspiring the people as lead characters in didactic moral stories and dramas, the gods served as a source of entertainment in the epics, contrasting with the strength, incorruptibility and virtue of the hero.
While the gods were powerful, they did not possess unlimited power, as it was implied that even Zeus, king of the gods, could be inhibited or even killed by the combined efforts of other gods, only having true mastery over their individual portfolio of powers, ex.
Hades had absolute domain of the underworld, Zeus over lightning and storm.
Ultimately the significant difference between the Hebrew God and the Greek gods was that that the absolute moral direction and unceasing tyranny of the former is surely missing in all of the latter. While the Hebrew God sought to bring about a cosmic order at least late in the history of the Tanakh between the forces of good and evil, moral absolutes, steering a divine people into a particular code of conduct by top-down commands and punishment, the Greek gods were players in the world who stood as role models to inspire the people on how to act by example in poetry and in the theatre.
Fundamentally Greek mythology did not demand an especially divisive worldview, as the Hebrew God did, as it did not have a conception of sin, or of judging people on the merits of their perceived transgressions. While the Greek gods could be related to, or be perceived as extraordinary humans, the Hebrew God is an unknowable sociopath of capricious insanity which at one moment preaches love and in the next eradicates entire cities of people without pause or reason.
Ultimately the nature of the Hebrew God can be lent to the environment to which it was created: The Greeks, another cosmopolitan and cultured people by relative standards would come to create gods which fancied wisdom, creativity, love, poetry, courage, beauty, song, dance and merriment, aspects which they thought were the touchstones of humanity.
The Jews, too prone to violence and indecency, were unable to raise themselves from their barbaric infancy and instead resigned to be ruled by a madman.Monotheism is distinguished from henotheism, a religious system in which the believer worships one god without denying that others may worship different gods with equal validity, and monolatrism, the recognition of the existence of many gods but with the consistent worship of only one deity.
In the Hebrew Tanakh, God is referred to as Elohim or Adonai, in addition to other names. In Islam, and competing claims as to God's characteristics, aims, and actions, have led to the development of ideas of omnitheism, Another view is religious pluralism.
A pluralist typically believes that his religion is the right one, but does not. III: Polytheism and Monotheism. Greek and later Europe inheriting from the Greek, is due to the difference between the monotheistic and polytheistic point of view.
We must reckon much with the temperamental differences of the races. invested with the tradition and characteristics of . In setting up a typology of monotheism to show the ideal types toward which the various monotheistic religious traditions seem to point, it is important to realize that even within one tradition there will be different experiences and philosophies of monotheism.
The three monotheist religious traditions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, have more in common than in contention. Three Religions, One God.
So from the point of view of the eschaton they. Monotheism: Monotheism, belief in the existence of one god, or in the oneness of God. As such, it is distinguished from polytheism, the belief in the existence of many gods, and from atheism, the belief that there is no god.
Monotheism characterizes the traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and.