Posted on July 7, by Scott Alexander [Content note: I get words all day through. First from him, now from you.
Race historical definitions During the Age of Enlightenment an era from the s to the sconcepts of monogenism and polygenism became popular, though they would only be systematized epistemologically during the 19th century.
Monogenism contends that all races have a single origin, while polygenism is the idea that each race has a separate origin. Until the 18th century, the words "race" and "species" were interchangeable. Henri de Boulainvilliers An early scientist who studied race was Robert Boyle —an Anglo-Irish natural philosopherchemistphysicistand inventor.
Boyle believed in what today is called 'monogenism', that is, that all races, no matter how diverse, came from the same source, Adam and Eve. He studied reported stories of parents' giving birth to different coloured albinosso he concluded that Adam and Eve were originally white and that whites could give birth to different coloured races.
Theories of Robert Hooke and Isaac Newton about color and light via optical dispersion in physics were also extended by Robert Boyle into discourses of polygenesis speculating that maybe these differences were due to "seminal impressions".
However, Boyle's writings mention that at his time, for "European Eyes", beauty was not measured so much in colourbut in "stature, comely symmetry of the parts of the body, and good features in the face".
The Frankish aristocracy dominated the Gauls by innate right of conquest. In his time, Henri de Boulainvilliersa believer in the "right of conquest", did not understand "race" as biologically immutable, but as a contemporary racist cultural construct.
His theoretic racialism was distinct from the biologic facts manipulated in 19th-century scientific racism. In his book Sketches on the History of Man, Home claimed that the environment, climate, or state of society could not account for racial differences, so the races must have come from distinct, separate stocks.
In Systema Naturaehe labeled five  " varieties "   of human species. Each one was described as possessing the following physiognomic characteristics "varying by culture and place": The sub-species included the "four-footed, mute, hairy" Homo feralis Feral man ; the animal-reared Juvenis lupinus hessensis Hessian wolf boythe Juvenis hannoveranus Hannoverian boythe Puella campanica Wild-girl of Champagneand the agile, but faint-hearted Homo monstrosus Monstrous man: In Amoenitates academicaeLinnaeus presented the mythologic Homo anthropomorpha Anthropomorphic manhumanoid creatures, such as the troglodytethe satyrthe hydraand the phoenixincorrectly identified as simian creatures.
On the one hand, the harshest critics say that the classification not only was ethnocentric but seemed to be based upon skin-color.
On the other hand, Quintyn points out that some authors believe the classification was based upon geographical distribution, being cartographically based, and not hierarchical.
KennedyLinneus certainly considered his own culture better, but his motives for classification of human varieties were not race-centered. Thus, regarding this topic, they consider Linnaeus view as merely " eurocentric ", arguing that Linnaeus never called for racist action, and did not use the word "race", which was only introduced later "by his French opponent Buffon ".
Rice agrees that Linnaeus' classification was not meant to "imply a hierarchy of humanness or superiority";  although modern critics see that his classification was obviously stereotypedand erroneous for having included anthropologicalnon-biological features such as customs or traditions.
John Hunter John Hunter —a Scottish surgeonsaid that originally the Negroid race was white at birth. He thought that over time because of the sun, the people turned dark skinned, or "black". Hunter also said that blisters and burns would likely turn white on a Negro, which he believed was evidence that their ancestors were originally white.
He believed that whites and Negroes were two different species.The Race and Social Justice Initiative (RSJI) is the City’s commitment to eliminate racial disparities and achieve racial equity in Seattle.
When RSJI began ten years ago, no U.S.
city had ever undertaken an effort that focused explicitly on institutional racism. Joining Groups. Coalition of Anti-Racist Whites (CARW): a group of white people in the Seattle area working to undo institutional racism and white privilege through education and organizing in white communities and active support of anti-racist, people of color-led caninariojana.com support the self-determination of people of color, honor their leadership and are held accountable to people of.
Social media has a racism problem because humans have a racism problem. Can one company solve it? A note on institutional racism The most significant problem facing people of color is the institutional and cultural racism which results in discrimination in access to services, goods and opportunities.
Critical Issues Forum. The Critical Issues Forum is a series of occasional reports addressing progessive racial justice issues in philanthropy. Social Principles: The Nurturing Community We believe we have a responsibility to innovate, sponsor, and evaluate new forms of community that will encourage development of the fullest potential in .